• stumu415@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 months ago

    Never been able to be sold outside of the US, including Europe or Asia because it would never pass the safety test, says it all.

    It also says something about the American safety tests and laws. Americans are so afraid of Chinese cars that pass all safety tests but this unsafe monstrosity roams the streets?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not only does it fail to pass basic safety tests it’s also too heavy to drive on a normal licence in pretty much all the countries of the world. It weighs so much that it qualifies as a truck, not a pickup truck, a six wheeler. It’s so heavy it has to take alternate routes around old bridges.

      Even if it was legal in Europe, it’d be such an inconvenience to drive that no one would want one.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      America only cares about the people buying cars.

      Those pedestrians can either buy Canyoneros of their own or go die with the poor.

    • kgbbot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just came back from a country full of Chinese cars…I gotta say there were some sexy ass solid feeling automobiles… Saw some tiny ones too, but I feel like I saw more busted rebadged tiny Chevys.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Eh, they sold them in Canada too, I’ve seen many of these garbage containers wobbling around on the roads here.

        • calliope@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is actually really funny, because Ralph Nader literally started his activist career pointing out that they didn’t in 1965.

          The book, critical of the automotive industry, argued that many American automobiles were generally unsafe to operate.

          Auto manufacturers were eventually forced to add seatbelts and protection for roll-overs.

          Nader’s book was cited as the reason to create what became the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

          When the original bill was passed,

          Speaker of the United States House of Representatives John William McCormack said the passage of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act was brought about by the "crusading spirit of one individual who believed he could do something: Ralph Nader.”

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            GMs president Alfred Sloane refused to install safety glass and boasted to investors: “GM doesn’t make cars, it makes money”.

          • randomwords@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            He also had to modify the corvair he claimed was unsafe to cause it to do unsafe things… Nader is a piece of shit.

            • calliope@retrolemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh totally, Nader is the piece of shit here…

              In response to Nader’s criticisms, GM attempted to sabotage Nader’s reputation. It “(1) conducted a series of interviews with acquaintances of the plaintiff, ‘questioning them about, and casting aspersions upon [his] political, social, racial and religious views; his integrity; his sexual proclivities and inclinations; and his personal habits’; (2) kept him under surveillance in public places for an unreasonable length of time; (3) caused him to be accosted by girls for the purpose of entrapping him into illicit relationships; (4) made threatening, harassing and obnoxious telephone calls to him; (5) tapped his telephone and eavesdropped, by means of mechanical and electronic equipment, on his private conversations with others; and (6) conducted a ‘continuing’ and harassing investigation of him.”

              Nader, on the other hand, literally took the money he won for GM’s harassment and intimidation and put it into a consumer protection organization.

              Then

              He went on to lobby for consumer rights, helping drive the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the passage of the Clean Air Act, among others

              You’re fucking delusional to pretend he was the bad guy in this situation.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ford also voluntarily recalled 1.5 million of them and addressed the fuel tank issue that caused the problem.

        “Fixing” the cybertruck would involve offering refunds scrapping them.

        • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          All that lithium sitting in storage lots, wasted. Tesla could save the CT with some sort of body kit conversion that tears it down to the frame and rebuilds it as a more traditional truck. It’ll still not be a great truck, but better than letting all those batteries rot.

          • oatscoop@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The frame is unfortunately a piece of poorly designed garbage too, even ignoring the Whistling Diesel torture test. And you can’t make something that isn’t a cybertruck using it, because:

            It’s not a traditional frame with a body built on top. It essentially is the cybertruck.

            They could (but won’t) design a vehicle that isn’t ridiculous and offer cybertruck owners a rebate on trade in. Yank the batteries, motors, and anything else that can be reused and scrap the rest.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        All cars out of Detroit were designed like that. They only went after Ford because Pinto sold well.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know I shouldn’t judge people without getting to know them but every time I see a cyber truck, I immediately think that the owner must be a gigantic douche canoe.

    • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      by the time the cybertruck started delivering, all pretense of who its maker really was was gone. no longer could you think of him as “just the electric car guy who was in the MCU that time and likes posting memes.” It was ABUNDANTLY obvious that he was a fascist boot heel. i can see any tesla on the road but the cybertuck and the model Y and rationalize that someone bought it without knowing, or sold it at a steep loss to someone who just needed a car. but the two newest models in the lineup? those directly funded fascism

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fiero wins again!

    It might sometimes be on fire, but unlike a cybertruck you can put it out!

    • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      At least the Cybertruck makes sure you don’t need to buy a new car, by locking its doors. /s

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I daily one, I know just what you are going though.

        Man what a wonderful pile of pontiac shit it is.

        • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You daily a fiero? Do you do the oil changes yourself? Which engine do you have? And did you or any previous owners change the gear ratios?

          I love the fiero’s of people who know what they are doing with them. If I win the lottery I would get one and have it converted to electric.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I drive a 85 Gt, with the V6 but have 2 others as parts cars. No other owner has changed the ratios as I have standard transmissions in all 3 of them. I do most of my own work, oil on a fiero is no issue. Most recently I hit a deer and just finished changing parts and getting a new windshield in it (and added too many deer whistles).

            I would like to convert one of the parts cars to electric, but the costs are kinda messed up.

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Probably because the are so noticeable, but I see 2 or 3 of them on my way to/from work. Hard to tell them apart, but that is a lot in the 20 miles I go.

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wish I didn’t have to see one almost every time I drive somewhere. They are such a standout eyesore that it feels like I see them constantly.

    • Sina@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think they are very impressive looking iconic cars in a vacuum, like DeLoreans. Everything else is really unfortunate about then, but imo the eyesore part largely comes from the -very justified- cultural baggage and pretty much that only.

      • anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        DeLoreans are way cooler than these cars. The cybertruck is a Pontiac Aztek designed by a toddler. It’s ugly from virtually every angle

      • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Without the cultural baggage, yeah, they are interesting looking from the side and front quarter angles. But the back side undeniably looks like a trash can or dumpster. I was behind one yesterday with a pink/green hueshift wrap. When I was in traffic behind it, it just looked like I had a green dumpster in front of me lol.

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah they’re ugly af.

        If you wrap them (like you should), then you can make them look cool though. Some of my favorites that I’ve seen are bright pink, yellow, and various wraps covered in decals.

        Without wrapping them, they look like scrap metal on wheels.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Even a paint job makes them look passable, ironically enough, and I’m what should be the target demo for cyberpunk murder wagons.

          I maintain part of the scam was always trying to push the cost of painting the things on the consumers. It’s not like it’s new information that steel rusts…

    • Malyca@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m terrified of them they’re basically mobile knives. In an accident they could do so much damage, especially anything involving pedestrians. Musk has been caught faking safety details also.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fun fact: the stainless steel body panels cannot effectively be repaired or refinished to insurance company standards, so if something should happen to even just cosmetically damage one of the main body panels, the entire vehicle is unrepairable and totalled.

    This is one of several reasons why the things are extremely expensive and difficult to insure. And, of course, it tells you how to do your part in making them even more expensive and difficult to insure.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hm. Maybe forming some kind of"flange" with holes in it on the edges of the body panel that you could use to secure it with a fastener of some sort … like clips and screws! Perhaps even plastic “push fasteners” that are easy to remove with a flat screwdriver!

        Brb, going to patent this original idea that’s never been done before.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d be more worried about the aluminum frame. Aluminum under cyclical stress will fatigue and eventually catastrophically fail. It’s why airlines have to constantly test aluminum parts so they can retire or replace them before they fail. It’s only a matter of time before cyber trucks start breaking in half while on the highway. It’s almost like there’s a reason no car manufacturers have made unibody frames out of aluminum before…

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your engineering knowledge needs some work. Most vehicles today have aluminum sub frames and suspension links. Aluminum only fatigues if stresses are beyond the design threshold. Whick is exactly why planes fly millions of miles, and are really only retired because of fuel efficiency.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Most vehicles today have aluminum sub frames

          A unibody frame is a bit different than a subframe. You can’t reinforce stress points with steel in a unibody frame like you can with a subframe . And no, most (63%) vehicles still use steel for subframes.

          Aluminum only fatigues if stresses are beyond the design threshold.

          What are you talking about? Cast aluminum lacks any distinct fatigue limit, so any cycle load causes microscopic damage at stress points.

          planes fly millions of miles, and are really only retired because of fuel efficiency.

          Again… Where are you pulling this from? Even aircraft grade Aluminum is about 50% more susceptible to metal fatigue than steel. All aircraft have to have routine inspections specifically for metal fatigue and part of regular maintenance is to replace what they can.

          engineering knowledge needs some work

          Right back at ya… I’m guessing you don’t work with metals in your job? Anyone working in practical engineering or metal fabrication knows aluminum has a big problem with cyclical loads.

    • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      On the second part, why don’t you just leave peoples vehicles alone? I mean I dont like Nissans either, but I’m not out laying subtle hints to damage people’s property because I don’t like them. That doesn’t make anyone sympathetic to a cause, it makes them more steadfast for whatever you are against. Absolute 1d thinking.

      • oats@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not saying you should damage either, but are Nissans also impossibility dangerous to anybody else out in public? I am pretty sure if a Cybertruck drove into a pedestrian even in modest speed it would total both.

        • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can say the same about any full sized truck at this point, everything’s ginormous. Just drove my FIL’s 1500 series Chevrolet the other day, that things ridiculous in size. It probably won’t be any smaller, or maybe just a tiny bit (I’m unsure for exact dimensions).