tst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Calif. passes strongest right-to-repair bill yet, requiring 7 years of partsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1544arrow-down18cross-posted to: sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.orgupliftingnews@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1536arrow-down1external-linkCalif. passes strongest right-to-repair bill yet, requiring 7 years of partsarstechnica.comtst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.orgupliftingnews@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareGimly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前Not sure if this is sarcasm, but yes, I do think artists should be rewarded, but not for more than 100 years after their death, that makes no sense.
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 年前im of opinion that strong copyright protects the vultures more than the artists, but i dont necessarily think it needs to be abolished. definitely should be way shorter though
minus-squareGimly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Today definitely, because their use was twisted by those big corporation. Forcing artists to give them the rights to the IP.
minus-squareNightAuthor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前So what, you don’t think corporations should have complete ownership and right to all the profits from the creations of their employees?
minus-squareCosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前 Not sure if this is sarcasm It was sarcasm.
Not sure if this is sarcasm, but yes, I do think artists should be rewarded, but not for more than 100 years after their death, that makes no sense.
im of opinion that strong copyright protects the vultures more than the artists, but i dont necessarily think it needs to be abolished. definitely should be way shorter though
Today definitely, because their use was twisted by those big corporation. Forcing artists to give them the rights to the IP.
So what, you don’t think corporations should have complete ownership and right to all the profits from the creations of their employees?
It was sarcasm.