cm0002@libretechni.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoBehold the future of programminglemmy.mlimagemessage-square172linkfedilinkarrow-up1811arrow-down114
arrow-up1797arrow-down1imageBehold the future of programminglemmy.mlcm0002@libretechni.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square172linkfedilink
minus-squareCoriza@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day agoWhich I think it is even more funny, why not just type them if is not a full audio back and forth.
minus-squareMichal@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoBecause it’s faster to speak than type, but reading is more practical than listening, especially if taking information is your main focus. It’s scannable, easier to read and reread selectively important parts, and listening to code is not useful.
Which I think it is even more funny, why not just type them if is not a full audio back and forth.
Because it’s faster to speak than type, but reading is more practical than listening, especially if taking information is your main focus.
It’s scannable, easier to read and reread selectively important parts, and listening to code is not useful.