ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 days agoMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1214arrow-down17
arrow-up1207arrow-down1imageMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 days agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·21 days agoIf nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·21 days ago3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all! /j
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoEEE Oh no that’s a Microsoft strategy
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·21 days agoThere’s now 4 competing standards. TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.
If nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all!
/j
D+++
EEE
Oh no that’s a Microsoft strategy
There’s now 4 competing standards.
TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.