I don’t think anyone needs to see the body cam footage of a labradoodle in a knicks shirt running up to give people hugs and kisses before being shot by psychopaths?
Just look at the dog.
There is absolutely zero possible chance that animal was a threat to anyone.
Nobody is going to even try to say otherwise, anyone that does will not be taken seriously by anyone who is being honest.
I don’t think anyone needs to see the body cam footage of a labradoodle in a knicks shirt running up to give people hugs and kisses before being shot by psychopaths?
Every damn day law enforcement faces grave dangers to their life in the form of violent and aggressive criminals. You’re seriously telling me if that…thing came at you, full speed, you wouldn’t empty your fucking clip on it? LOL…I’m in absolute disbelief right now.
Let me get this straight: it’s cool to demand Buddy cam footage of cops killing humans, but not animals? Is that what you’re saying? Because people can just like…not watch it. Just like they could not watch footage of any humans we’ve been seeing released.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem or are you just inventing something completely different to what I said to get mad about and then slapping a bunch of slogans on the end (one of which is just liberal) like it adds something?
Hi I want to apologize for yesterday. I was tired, sore, grumpy and misread your intent. If you don’t want to accept, I understand, I just wanted to say I’m sorry, anyway.
You’re taking the person you are replying to too literally. They were just saying that the dog is obviously a big sweet goofball by look and breed alone. They weren’t saying that the cam footage literally should not be reviewed.
I mean I’ve seen fluffballs that will eat your face and rotts, dobies, and pits that think they’re lapdogs. But yes, tone doesn’t always convey over the internet.
I don’t think anyone needs to see the body cam footage of a labradoodle in a knicks shirt running up to give people hugs and kisses before being shot by psychopaths?
Just look at the dog.
There is absolutely zero possible chance that animal was a threat to anyone.
Nobody is going to even try to say otherwise, anyone that does will not be taken seriously by anyone who is being honest.
Every damn day law enforcement faces grave dangers to their life in the form of violent and aggressive criminals. You’re seriously telling me if that…thing came at you, full speed, you wouldn’t empty your fucking clip on it? LOL…I’m in absolute disbelief right now.
Do you… shoot every dog that walks towards you?
Let me get this straight: it’s cool to demand Buddy cam footage of cops killing humans, but not animals? Is that what you’re saying? Because people can just like…not watch it. Just like they could not watch footage of any humans we’ve been seeing released.
Hands up, don’t shoot! I can’t breathe! No kings!
Huh?
Do you have a reading comprehension problem or are you just inventing something completely different to what I said to get mad about and then slapping a bunch of slogans on the end (one of which is just liberal) like it adds something?
What is wrong with you? I’m not mad but you seem to have issues.
Nice ad hominem. Obviously the cops are saying the animal rushed them. Body cam will clear it up.
Hi I want to apologize for yesterday. I was tired, sore, grumpy and misread your intent. If you don’t want to accept, I understand, I just wanted to say I’m sorry, anyway.
Wishing you well. ❤️🩹
You’re taking the person you are replying to too literally. They were just saying that the dog is obviously a big sweet goofball by look and breed alone. They weren’t saying that the cam footage literally should not be reviewed.
I mean I’ve seen fluffballs that will eat your face and rotts, dobies, and pits that think they’re lapdogs. But yes, tone doesn’t always convey over the internet.
???