they didn’t even bother with a pretence of a primary the second time.

        • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          So you have a candidate that’s a pedophile hitler, then a candidate that’s neither hitler nor pedophile. But you decided to not vote because none is good enough. Doing that you just said that you are ok with both, you know? You basically said that hitler was as bad as non-hitler.

          • CottonSeed@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            You basically said that hitler was as bad as non-hitler.

            they don’t need to be the same for neither of them to be acceptable

                • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Well, if you didn’t vote against him, you can’t say you’re against what he’s doing. You made a choice, and that choice was saying that none was acceptable, hence both were ok to win. Was harris better than pedohitler, or not? Because that’s the only thing that counts. You could have voted for the better option and start working from there. Instead you decided to not vote. If you abstain, you are ok with either result, that’s just how it is. You can’t complain of a result if you didn’t vote.

                  • CottonSeed@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    f you didn’t vote against him, you can’t say you’re against what he’s doing.

                    sure I could. I could do that even if I voted for him.