What should we think of other people’s religions, if our biggest concern is equality?
This question is answered by a western “reality as objective” anarchist mindset, and by radically inclusive anarcho-antirealism.
Mirror: https://scribe.rip/@viridiangrail/real-anarchists-vs-unreal-anarchists-on-religion-2d9685faf741
I’m actually an unreal anarchist. This article is contrasting the views of unreal anarchists like Myself, and the realist anarchists we disagree with.
No idea what that means. I thought you meant the sort of real that usually starts a no true scot arguement.
Grail suffers from Dissociative Identity Disorder or some similar mental health condition.
Part of this is believing that there are multiple universes or “realities” inhabited by well anything you can imagine. This often manifests into their different alt accounts and having conversations with them, and other beings who inhabit their body or something.
They’ve previously spoken about no longer getting mental help, which is sad because during their more lucid moments they’re not too bad a person.
Hence being anti realist to them is rejection of well reality itself. This is somehow an Anarchist perspective in their mind.
Thats kind of wild. I always give users the benefit of the doubt and interact with them myself. I kinda get the “I reject your reality and supplant my own” ideal but as a form of ultimate rebellion and not an actual achievable goal.
Did you read the article this post is a link to?
Speaking only for myself, I would be more likely to read the article if you included what you meant by “real” and “unreal” anarchists in the post.
Duly noted, thanks for the advice!