• StripedMonkey@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even here, the guy you’re responding to is getting down voted to oblivion (for Lemmy anyways) for an opinion that I have echoed elsewhere and gotten the opposite response.

    Not having the majority opinion of this community seems to mean downvotes too. The only real difference is that reddit has enough staying power for people to put up with it.

    • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even here, the guy you’re responding to is getting down voted to oblivion (for Lemmy anyways) for an opinion that I have echoed elsewhere and gotten the opposite response.

      I’m on a Lemmy instance that has downvotes disabled. I can only see that the person I replied to has 3 upvotes and that me previous comment has 2. I don’t even see the negativity on Lemmy.

      • StripedMonkey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        He’s at -5 at the moment. Depending on what instances you have blocked, you’re going to see different amounts. It doesn’t mean those people aren’t there.

        • Peffse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Even if the post is true, it was the worst way to present it. It reads like trolling:

          Call out people’s politics with grandiose rhetoric, not backing up any claims with links to evidence.

          Declare the other side is unbiased.

          I mean, Internet 101 would dictate you downvote and disengage. It’s not going to generate a discussion that would change minds or be constructive. Even now we’re not talking about small website discoverability, but instead downvotes.

          EDIT: I’m going to put my money where my mouth is. I’ll try the same post.