What’s at stake is whether “protecting children” becomes a legal pretext for embedding government control over the internet to enforce specific moral and religious judgments—judgments that deny marginalized people access to speech, community, history, and truth—into law.

What’s at stake is whether “protecting children” becomes a legal pretext for embedding government control over the internet to enforce specific moral and religious judgments—judgments that deny marginalized people access to speech, community, history, and truth—into law.

  • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.netEnglish
    21·
    4 months ago

    Why is this all of a sudden a problem we need draconian solutions to? I mean we all k.ow it’s because of opposition to the Gaza Genocide being widespread enough to scare the ruling class, but that’s the excuse? Spell it out, why should I go along with all this?