• Lena@gregtech.eu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yeah open source monetization sucks in the corporate world. Maybe there could be a license that goes something along the lines of “you may use this for free as long as your company’s yearly revenue isn’t over X €”

    • RmDebArc_5@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tying it to revenue wouldn’t work that well due to inflation. Metas AI has a license that basically says that, but with a user number. Both ideas however would mean that the project isn’t open source anymore

      • Lena@gregtech.eu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        True, I don’t think there’s really a good solution to this (other than getting rid of capitalism)

    • boredsquirrel (he)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      3 months ago

      Called “Fair use” or “ethical software” but people hate it and lawyers tell you it is not enforceable for… some reason

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think a better enforcable solution would be taxing the shit out of these corporations, then give state grants to open source projects. I actually looked into licenses that would allow me to force corpos to donate, but they’re unenforcable.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ultimately, the solution to many problems caused by corporations abusing their positions is through taxation

    • xvapx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, the obvious solution is to use a strong copyleft license like AGPL and sell private licenses for closed-source projects.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Epic does that but it’s under a contract (user agreement) not the license and OSS can’t afford the legal fees that they can.

      The other issue is putting the license under a shell company.