magz :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 months agojprulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square51linkfedilinkarrow-up1427arrow-down18
arrow-up1419arrow-down1imagejprulelemmy.blahaj.zonemagz :3@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 months agomessage-square51linkfedilink
minus-squarecraftrabbit@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up47arrow-down1·11 months agoExcept webp has worse compression, doesn’t support HDR and has a max colour depth of 8bpc. What makes JPEG-XL great is that it covers loads of use cases and is very future proof.
minus-squarekopasz7@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down4·11 months agoWebp, on the other hand is “current-proof”. JXL’s biggest issue is getting adoption, not the technical aspects. The meme is right, chrome/ium support would do a lot to help adoption. But not even the mainline FF version has support (AFAIK).
minus-squarerapchee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 months agoedit: the option doesn’t seem to actually enable support stable firefox has an option to support it, in about:config that is set to false by default
Except webp has worse compression, doesn’t support HDR and has a max colour depth of 8bpc. What makes JPEG-XL great is that it covers loads of use cases and is very future proof.
Webp, on the other hand is “current-proof”. JXL’s biggest issue is getting adoption, not the technical aspects.
The meme is right, chrome/ium support would do a lot to help adoption. But not even the mainline FF version has support (AFAIK).
edit: the option doesn’t seem to actually enable support
stable firefox has an option to support it, in about:config that is set to false by default