wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comexternal-linkmessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1212arrow-down19cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1203arrow-down1external-linkHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comwikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square49linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squaresalty_chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down26·1 year agoI don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 year agoTheir point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia. It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
minus-squareSckharshantallas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-21 year agoYou totally misunderstood the comment.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoBait used to be believable
I don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
Their point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia.
It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
You totally misunderstood the comment.
Bait used to be believable
deleted by creator
Yep, graduated!