Explanation: Just a linguistics joke. “Trad” chuds often insist there are only two genders, and idolize Rome, without the first idea about Rome other than “Marble busts and strong jawed legions”.
But the Latin language itself has three genders - masculine, feminine, and neuter!
Be careful - they might just take the word “neuter” a bit too far…
I’ve never made the link between that and gender before (linguistically), it seems obvious in hindsight.
be careful - they might just take the word “neuter” a bit too far…
Transfems looking for free oriectomies:
Oh no, anyway
Reminder grammatical gender and social gender are different things. For example, the grammatical neuter in Latin is mostly things, so it isn’t a viable way to refer to people; it’s like using “it” in English, you know? It gets nasty.
…not that the chuds would understand this. They’re probably busier screeching at “agricola” (farmer) describing pretty much their ideal life, and yet looking like a feminine word. (It’s masculine but 1st declension, so you decline it as you would decline puella/girl.)
111?
Non CXI, sed tantum III.





