I’ve seen a few articles saying that instead of hating AI, the real quiet programmers young and old are loving it and have a renewed sense of purpose coding with llm helpers (this article was also hating on ed zitiron, which makes sense why it would).

Is this total bullshit? I have to admit, even though it makes me ill, I’ve used llms a few times to help me learn simple code syntax quickly (im and absolute noob who’s wanted my whole life to learn code but cant grasp it very well). But yes, a lot of time its wrong.

  • iglou@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago
    1. A junior dev wont be a junior dev their whole career, code reviews also educates them
    2. You can’t trust the quality of a junior’s work, but you can trust that they are able to understand the project and their role in it. LLMs are by definition unable to think and understand. Just pretty good at pretending they are. Which leads to the third point:
    3. When you “vibe code”, you don’t “just” have to review the produced code, you also have to constantly tell the LLM what you want it to do. And fight with it when it fucks up.