By meeting with them regularly as their neighbor and getting to know their needs through continuous dialog and figuring out how to make you and them materially reliant on one another in order to create an organic, interdependent, cooperative community in which the wants and needs of individuals become aligned.
This has literally always been the only way to dependably avoid your scenario under any system, regardless of institutional obfuscations to the contrary. Anarchism really just strips away those obfuscations and thrusts it’s participants directly into mutual power with one another.
Yes, but when a group of sadists takes over a neighborhood by force and call themselves overlords because they have weapons. Is there a Human Rights council? Who enforces that everyone has mutual power and don’t gather around a figure to prop themselves up?
I reiterate that this is where it all started and some people aren’t cooperative enough for this system of thought.
It might be an ideal to strive for, but to realize it we must screen people for constructively cooperative psyche/DNA. That screening is probably needed if we want conscious life to go far anyway so I’m in.
No, you don’t need eugenics to do anarchism. What the fuck.
And the answer to your question is guns. If a group of sadists try to take control of your neighborhood, you arm everyone and you kill them. You think anarchists are incapable of violence or something?? When ISIS tried to occupy Rojava they encountered communities where every grandma had an AK and was trained to use it. ISIS lost that fight.
By meeting with them regularly as their neighbor and getting to know their needs through continuous dialog and figuring out how to make you and them materially reliant on one another in order to create an organic, interdependent, cooperative community in which the wants and needs of individuals become aligned.
This has literally always been the only way to dependably avoid your scenario under any system, regardless of institutional obfuscations to the contrary. Anarchism really just strips away those obfuscations and thrusts it’s participants directly into mutual power with one another.
Yes, but when a group of sadists takes over a neighborhood by force and call themselves overlords because they have weapons. Is there a Human Rights council? Who enforces that everyone has mutual power and don’t gather around a figure to prop themselves up?
I reiterate that this is where it all started and some people aren’t cooperative enough for this system of thought.
It might be an ideal to strive for, but to realize it we must screen people for constructively cooperative psyche/DNA. That screening is probably needed if we want conscious life to go far anyway so I’m in.
No, you don’t need eugenics to do anarchism. What the fuck.
And the answer to your question is guns. If a group of sadists try to take control of your neighborhood, you arm everyone and you kill them. You think anarchists are incapable of violence or something?? When ISIS tried to occupy Rojava they encountered communities where every grandma had an AK and was trained to use it. ISIS lost that fight.