• patatas@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We don’t have a clear legal mechanism, but we to have the power of public outrage.

    The whole point of conflict of interest legislation is that politicians should not have, nor be seen to have, opportunity for personal gain.

    Carney could easily clear this up to satisfy critics like myself. Choosing not to only makes it look worse, frankly.

    People mad about Poilievre not having a security clearance should also be mad about this.

      • patatas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If this were simply a ploy to manufacture outrage, then Carney’s best move would be to neutralize that ploy, or ‘distraction’, by calling people’s bluff and actually being transparent.

        Instead, he got angry at reporters for asking him about it, and denied that there could be any possible conflict.

        Meanwhile he continues to pitch projects in sectors that Brookfield has tens of billions invested in.

          • patatas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, he didn’t have to run for the Liberal leadership on the first place. I heard one commentator describe it as the ‘opportunity cost’ of running for PM.

            Am I surprised that someone who sets up funds in the Caymans is trying to use the letter of the rules as a get out of jail free card? No.

            But he must have known it would look terrible. If all this was a surprise to Carney, then we should be very worried about his ability to govern this country.

              • patatas@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                He should waive his right to exercise those stock options. Or step down if he values the money more.

                This is why a PM gets a good salary and pension: they’re giving up things to be in a position of immense power. That’s the trade.

                  • patatas@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Lol I figured you’d say that.

                    Why is it “crazy” to want to ensure the leader of a country doesn’t have multi-million dollar conflicts of interest?

                    Sorry, but I don’t think we should be casual about this stuff. He’s making decisions that affect 40 million people.

                    If Carney doesn’t want to be PM then he can step down. If he does, then he has to accept limitations on what counts as a “blind” trust.

                    I don’t think this is unreasonable in the slightest.