Ukraine’s National Corruption Prevention Agency added major food corporations PepsiCo and Mars to the “international sponsors of war” list on Sept. 1.

        • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hexbear’s been isolated for a while, and their site developed a culture of trashing on people who “debate” in bad faith, as well as some other stuff like PPB which is weird especially for outsiders.

          If you’re browsing internal Hexbear posts, you’ll find lots of posts under irony which make them perhaps difficult to appreciate. I’d recommend visiting Lemmygrad first.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are easily riled and while I doubt there is intentional coordination in place, due to their fervour, they can come across like a brigade. If you speak up against them - cue the hexbears flocking to this comment no doubt - they can get quite vicious, as my comment history will witness.

      • mihor@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hexbear sounds like a sigma male hangout. It sure is gay to defederate such a place.

    • Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Increasingly, “tankies” seem to cover any infraction against the approved anti-russian fervor;

      • if you are not convinced Russia blew up Nord Stream
      • if you are not convinced that Russia blew up a farmer and a tractor in Poland
      • if you are not convinced that Ukraines summer offensive is going all that well
      • if you believe normal Russian people are not evil monsters
      • if you are not convinced that Putin ordered the downing of Prigozhins plane
      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have been called one just for being critical of the US military, it’s a catch all term for anyone that isnt strictly for capitalist imperialism. I consider it a soft resurgence of the red scare, I cringe each time I see it just like when I see the term lib.

        Both the pro Russian and the pro america-no-matter-the-cost crowds just stink of stupidity imo

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not really. It’s someone who claims to be liberal or progressive or a way left thinker willing to use force to make the world what they want

        People who diminish or refute Tiananmen Square 1989 are tankies

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because tankies are next-level communists. So while all tankies are also commies, not all commies are tankies.

            For me the biggest distinction is that I think commies are just naive and want to live in a fairy tale, tankies are actually malicious and want to fuck it up for all of us if we let them.

        • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s original definition doesn’t include liberals. I consider myself relatively left. I’ve had people ridicule some of my viewpoints for being too liberal (I guess too center for them). Those people were tankies, but they weren’t tankies because they’re more left than me. It’s because they consider themselves to be very left leaning while still praising authoritative regimes and being apologists for them. That’s the tank part. They’re alright with military dictatorships of the past and even consider them to have been successful. They also rarely are able to admit the flaws of those regimes (including the genocides), and even if they do, there’s a “reason” for it (X might have been bad and did this, but at the same time, it also did Y which was somewhat good)

        • Edward (any)@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is the problem with “tankie”, nobody can actually define it.

          You, attempting to refute that it’s “woke” but for liberals, proved that it is “woke” for liberals.

          • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            attempting to refute that it’s “woke” but for liberals

            The best refutation is that woke is “woke” for liberals, but Americans fail to recognize both of their parties are liberals.