It could be spent recklessly, sure, but spending it for charity in a way that makes an impact takes a lot of work. Without any thought or care, someone could unload $100b and not make any positive impact at all. You could say you’d give it all to poor people, give 20,000 people $5m each, set them up for life and put them in a financial position to help even more people. But then you run into the lotto winner statistics, where over the course of 5 years most people end up broke or in debt, even worse off than when they started. Then the money is gone with nothing to show for it, but a bunch of people who’s lives were fucked up.
He’d be significantly more rich had he not been giving it away.
His charity is also setup to be dissolved sometime after his death (20 years I think), with the idea that it’s up to the next generation to do stuff.
It could be spent recklessly, sure, but spending it for charity in a way that makes an impact takes a lot of work. Without any thought or care, someone could unload $100b and not make any positive impact at all. You could say you’d give it all to poor people, give 20,000 people $5m each, set them up for life and put them in a financial position to help even more people. But then you run into the lotto winner statistics, where over the course of 5 years most people end up broke or in debt, even worse off than when they started. Then the money is gone with nothing to show for it, but a bunch of people who’s lives were fucked up.
He’d be significantly more rich had he not been giving it away.
His charity is also setup to be dissolved sometime after his death (20 years I think), with the idea that it’s up to the next generation to do stuff.