return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 9 days agoWhite House Says It Will Now Determine Who Will Participate In Press Pooldeadline.comexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1190arrow-down12cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1188arrow-down1external-linkWhite House Says It Will Now Determine Who Will Participate In Press Pooldeadline.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squarethallamabond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up47·9 days ago “We’re going to keep them out until such time as they agree that it’s the Gulf of America,” Mr. Trump said Tuesday. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/associated-press-sues-trump-officials-over-coverage-restrictions/ But he urged the Trump administration to reconsider its two-week-old ban, saying that case law “is uniformly unhelpful to the White House.” https://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/judge-rejects-immediately-restoring-aps-access-to-white-house-but-urges-government-to-reconsider When it became clear the first ban would be found illegal, they just try another.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27·9 days agoIf there is no enforcement mechanism to enforcing the law on the executive branch, there is no law.
minus-squareiAmTheTot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·9 days agoThe executive branch is actually supposed to be, yknow, executing the laws. That’s why they are called that.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·8 days ago The executive branch is actually supposed to be Supposed to is irrelevant. A system that doesn’t have guard rails against what is taking place is a bad system.
minus-squareiAmTheTot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·8 days agoI was agreeing with you, for the record, just providing context.
minus-squarecrank0271@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 days agoIt’s hard to believe that with all of the malicious shitheads we’ve suffered in our politics previously, this buffoon is the guy breaking the system. (I agree with both of you agreeing.)
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 days agoIt doesn’t take intelligence to destroy. Just a willingness to do so.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/associated-press-sues-trump-officials-over-coverage-restrictions/
https://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/judge-rejects-immediately-restoring-aps-access-to-white-house-but-urges-government-to-reconsider
When it became clear the first ban would be found illegal, they just try another.
If there is no enforcement mechanism to enforcing the law on the executive branch, there is no law.
The executive branch is actually supposed to be, yknow, executing the laws. That’s why they are called that.
Supposed to is irrelevant. A system that doesn’t have guard rails against what is taking place is a bad system.
I was agreeing with you, for the record, just providing context.
It’s hard to believe that with all of the malicious shitheads we’ve suffered in our politics previously, this buffoon is the guy breaking the system. (I agree with both of you agreeing.)
It doesn’t take intelligence to destroy. Just a willingness to do so.