• David in Tokyo@mastodon.mit.edu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    @mattblaze@federate.social

    Feel free to tell me I’m dizzy, but:

    I find correctly perspective corrected images to make the buildings look top-heavy. You’ve got the lines straight and parallel, but what I’d want would be a perceptually realistic (yes, that doesn’t mean anything: sue me) rendering. And I don’t know how to do that.

    I let my Canon 24 TSE II go because with the adaptor it was just too much of a clunker on a mirrorless. Sigh. So I haven’t put in anywhere near the amount of effort this deserves.

    • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      @djl I think a lot of what looks “correct” has to do with learned expectations. If you look at photos of architecture from, say, 100 years ago, the majority display carefully aligned vertical lines, because most cameras had movements that made that easy. As small cameras (without movements) became more common even in professional use, that expectation declined.

      • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        @djl Also, if you look at *paintings* from the same period, you often see the opposite, with highly exaggerated perspective effects that photography of the time generally avoided. (See, for example O’Keeffe’s skyscraper paintings).

        • David in Tokyo@mastodon.mit.edu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          @mattblaze@federate.social

          Matt: Looking at more images is, of course, good advice. You’ve mentioned in the past several names I wasn’t aware of, so, thanks.

          I got stuck on the Minor White/Ansel Adams axis in high school (68-72 or so) when every issue of Aperture was jaw-dropping amazing. I really wanted to study with Minor White (who was at MIT when I was), but realized a hyperactive computer nerd might grate on White’s sensibilities…

          An attempt from those days…

          https://pbase.com/davidjl/image/170630571

  • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    This was captured with a DSLR and a 19mm shifting lens, from a balcony of another building.

    It’s mostly an exercise in angles and symmetry. The vaguely wedge-shaped dark cloud that appeared overhead, following the lines of the buildings, created a fortuitous moment.

    The Waldorf was closed for an extensive renovation shortly after this was made and has not yet fully re-opened. Many of the rooms are being converted into condo apartments.

    • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      The Waldorf-Astoria is perhaps New York’s most prominent monument to jazz age luxury and glamor. It’s been the traditional residence for US presidents and foreign heads of state when in town (the “presidential suite” was meant rather literally there).

      Built over the below-grade railyard of Grand Central Terminal, the hotel was equipped with a private rail siding and platform where guests could park their personal railcars(!). (Andy Warhol once threw a party on the platform.)

        • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          @fuzzface If I remember correctly, there are two doors at either end, one is the brass door at the Waldorf, and the other is a block south in the alley next to the Barclay. The platform is still there, but I don’t think guests of either hotel have taken much advantage of it recently.

            • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              @fuzzface@epsilon-ix.masto.host I’ve heard that too, but I’m skeptical that it was ever a serious contingency plan. The track layout makes it a rather poor choice for a quick escape, since it would require a fairly lengthy set of reverse switching moves from the siding to get lined up for the Park Avenue tunnel.

      • Dave C.@twit.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        @mattblaze@federate.social These posts always make me want to try photography. Then I remember I don’t have an artistic bone in my body. I still enjoy them though.

        • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          @davesomebody@twit.social maybe you’re wrong about not being artistic! I make photographs mostly because I can’t draw.