• RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Meta also allegedly modified settings “so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur,”

    Big tech taking without giving back to the community once again.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think this is still going to be a net benefit to us, though. Meta may not have contributed much bandwidth, which is leeching in the short term, but in the long term they’re now forced to contribute something much more important; lawyer power. Meta is going to have to fight to defend piracy.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 days ago

          You think Meta will just roll over and hand out whatever penalties the publishers demand of them?

          Meta isn’t going to be defending us. It’s going to be defending itself. Because it is now one of us.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          Well, yes, why would you believe something without seeing it? But given how litigious the publishing industry is about this kind of thing I don’t see it as likely that they wouldn’t fight.

      • 0range@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah they’ll lawyer up, but only for themselves. They have no reason to to do anything that benefits the rest of us.

        Maybe the torrenting community could see some legal benefits, but only if incentives align. Which they very well may not because Meta is not one of us and their interests don’t really align with anyone else’s.