• Rosewins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Well let this be a lesson that encrypted messaging hosted on corporate servers is only encrypted as long as the authorities allow it.

    Also criminals gonna get in trouble.

    • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Telegram isn’t encrypted. There’s an option but nobody uses it and doesn’t work in group chats.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It never was encrypted. If it was they wouldn’t have anything to turn over.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is false. There is still plenty of metadata that centralized providers can capture and turn over and that is usually sufficient for law-enforcement to get the information they want.

        • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Right, WhatsApp is encrypted but not private at all. Reason? Metadatas, says as much as the message

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is false. They cannot turn over any type of data that is encrypted. Metadata or otherwise. That’s the point of encryption.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Except that most of the metadata isn’t encrypted anywhere and usually also can’t be encrypted as otherwise the service wouldn’t be able to function.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Plenty of services encrypt metadata. You need to do more research.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                2 months ago

                You seem to be highly misinformed what metadata is. A server for example will always have access to unencrypted IP addresses from the clients connecting to it, this is impossible to avoid unless you use a service like Tor that relays internet traffic, but that has very little to do with “encryption”.

                • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Another thing a server can easily access is the timestamp of messages. Even if that is somehow stored encrypted in the server, messages are sent in real time and the server can easily log those, so an e2e encryption chat service will at the very least have logs with IP and timestamps. This can’t really be avoided.