• Alphamars@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can’t afford a broken system anytime and that’s why i can’t use linux. It breaks when you least expect.

      • hellofriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The only thing I ever had consistently break on me on Windows was the search indexing running constantly and eating up all my resources. Easy enough to turn that off, but then you can’t search files. I switched because I don’t like corpos. Just curious what happened with your system to make you ditch it.

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      My son was literally crying earlier today because his VR headset is no longer visible from Windows and all of his efforts to fix it (driver updates, tweaking various program settings, and so on) failed.

      So… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        A perfect example of what windows stans are blind to. That you will literally always have trouble on windows doing most things (at some point), and depending on what software you use and other factors, windows might be more problematic for you than even running a rolling release that might break any time. That’s the case for me. Also, running the less stable releases is absolutely a choice. Other more stable releases probably break far less often than windows.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Funnily enough I could say the same about Windows

      That thing has broken itself more times than I can count but my 2 linux machines (I still have 1 Windows machine) have been rock solid for 2 years now

      The most only reason I have the last Windows machine is because I’ve been lazy about switching it lol

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my experience Windows takes way more troubleshooting and time debugging and fixing things than linux does. Theres a reason people use linux for critical servers, it tends to be extremely reliable once everything is set up.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Not to mention is is very easy to automate. You can deploy thousands of servers with a button and delete them all if you want.

    • sgibson5150@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Try Silverblue or Kinoite. They’re designed such that if you find an update breaks something, you can literally revert to the version before that update with a reboot. Application distribution through flatpaks offers pre-configured environments so it’s not a pain to get stuff running. Toolbox lets you dick around in isolation from the system. You’d really have to go out of your way to break something. Great stuff.