kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 days agoI'm shook to my rulelemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1626arrow-down15
arrow-up1621arrow-down1external-linkI'm shook to my rulelemmy.mlkingthrillgore@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 days agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareAtlusb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up51·11 days agoYes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.
minus-squarealcoholicorn@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·11 days agoWhich policy though? He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup’d by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.
minus-squareNanook@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·11 days ago“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.
minus-squarekautau@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 days agoshhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they’re sensitive creatures
minus-squarealcoholicorn@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·11 days agoGore supported the first war in Iraq, and bombing Yugoslavia. Why do you think he would have been any different RE gorillas or imperialism?
Yes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.
Which policy though?
He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup’d by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.
Gorilla policy
“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.
shhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they’re sensitive creatures
He opposed the war in Iraq
Gore supported the first war in Iraq, and bombing Yugoslavia. Why do you think he would have been any different RE gorillas or imperialism?