misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoGoogle gets an error-corrected quantum bit to be stable for an hourarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1326arrow-down14
arrow-up1322arrow-down1external-linkGoogle gets an error-corrected quantum bit to be stable for an hourarstechnica.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down104·2 months agoWhat’s to research? A fucking abacus can hold data longer than a goddamn hour.
minus-squareDeceptichum@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up53arrow-down1·2 months agoAre you really comparing a fucking abacus to quantum mechanics and computing?
minus-squareHadriscus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up56·edit-22 months agothey are baiting honest people with absurd statements
minus-squarerumba@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agoRussian election interference money dried up and now they’re bored
minus-squarescarabic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoThey are shaking some informative answers out of literate people so I’m getting something out of it :D
minus-squareRedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoAbsurdly ignorant questions that, when answered, will likely result in people knowing more about quantum computing than they did before.
minus-squarerumba@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoAnd if it stopped there, we’d all be the better for it :)
minus-squarechaosCruiser@futurology.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·2 months agoDon’t feed the trolls.
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down13·2 months agoYes, as far as memory integrity goes anyways. Hell, even without an abacus, the wet noodle in my head still has better memory integrity.
minus-squareRin@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 months agoWelp, quantum computers have certain advantages (finding elements in O(sqrt(n)) time complexity, factorizing primes, etc). The difficulty is actually making everything stable because these machines are pretty complex. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_supremacy
minus-squarewhere_am_i@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down12·2 months agoBased take.
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoYou disrespect the meaning of based
What’s to research? A fucking abacus can hold data longer than a goddamn hour.
Are you really comparing a fucking abacus to quantum mechanics and computing?
they are baiting honest people with absurd statements
Russian election interference money dried up and now they’re bored
They are shaking some informative answers out of literate people so I’m getting something out of it :D
True
Absurdly ignorant questions that, when answered, will likely result in people knowing more about quantum computing than they did before.
And if it stopped there, we’d all be the better for it :)
Don’t feed the trolls.
Yes, as far as memory integrity goes anyways. Hell, even without an abacus, the wet noodle in my head still has better memory integrity.
Welp, quantum computers have certain advantages (finding elements in O(sqrt(n)) time complexity, factorizing primes, etc). The difficulty is actually making everything stable because these machines are pretty complex.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_supremacy
Based take.
You disrespect the meaning of based
He meant base