• bizarroland@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    27 days ago

    Yes.

    They are penis models, not human beings.

    It is context specific.

    If a human being asked you to do sex things to them and you decide to do it then you have been granted enthusiastic consent to do those sex things.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      27 days ago

      So if they are model penises but you are not asked to put the condom on them, but you do anyway, is that sexual assault?

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      The original comment doesnt include anything about objects… It only talks about tasks and people asking you to complete tasks.

      Ofcourse you cant rape an object, but the comment wasnt talking about that, it was talking about something much more generalized.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        27 days ago

        The post does point out that there’s a table full of penis models (so essentially dildos) and that the task is to put a condom on one of them.

        A bodyless fake penis is clearly not a sentient being so the only way a violation of consent happened if consent applied to inanimate objects. That is, of course, a ridiculous and easily attacked proposition.

        In the end this would be an example of trying to make a valid point but making it in a clumsy way.

      • Undaunted@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        You really have to get into that mercenary mindset. You’re obviously not responsible for your actions, if you’re just executing tasks someone else wants you to do. Smh