• Takumidesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why does it need to be sold to another big company, why can’t they just break Google up so chrome becomes its own business?

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Chrome by itself would likely cost 100 billion dollars to sell, and then more to maintain, without any clear revenue except selling user data. Chrome is not a profitable product on its own. Not many companies can afford that.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well shucks, I guess it should just be made fully open source, the code distributed, and the business dissolved. Womp wooomp.

        • CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The overwhelming majority of development to Chromium is done by Google and not the open source contributors to the project. Maintaining a browser is not something that can be done for free as a hobby. It requires an army of full-time developers to sustain.

          Given all of the major browsers except Firefox are using Chromium, the best case scenario for spinning off Chrome is that Microsoft would pick up the lion’s share of development to keep Edge up to date.

          This is the same reason that all of the major Linux distributions have large foundations to support them.

          The DoJ would do less harm to the internet if they just forced Google to sell off Search instead. Then they’d be an advertising and cloud services company that happens to maintain a major browser to serve their ads.

          • pup_atlas@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            There are multiple other browser startups in development that are not Chromium based. Like LadyBird (which is completely independant), and Zen browser (which started as a FF fork)

          • aeharding@vger.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ehh, I wouldn’t consider Safari “using chromium” at this point. It has been hard forked for years. Chrome could disappear tomorrow and it wouldn’t affect Safari development.

            • Infomatics90@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Safari has roots in chromium? I thought it was WebKit or something else for it’s engine.

              • coolmojo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Safari is using WebKit. WebKit started as a fork of the KHTML and KJS libraries from KDE and has since been further developed by  KDE contributors, Apple, Google, Nokia, Bitstream, BlackBerry, Sony, Igalia and others. On April 3, 2013, Google announced that it had forked WebCore, a component of WebKit, to be used in future versions of Google Chrome, under the name Blink. Source: Wikipedia