• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just… I could never comprehend twitter (or Mastadon, or bluesky for that matter).

    The whole structure of the conversation feel like people shouting into an open auditorium. And everyone is shouting at once.

    I just do not see the appeal.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m with you 100%. The Twitter product has always been a clunky pile of bullshit for me. But somehow it became the default public space and choice of celebrities, etc and I think that has been 98% of its appeal.

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yea. Used it for four things. To keep up to date with creators I like, to keep up to date with friends, to keep up to date with a bunch of webcomics and to randomly rant into the void when I felt like it.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah. I think that’s the appeal. You could just shout things and hope others would follow until a part of the auditorium would turn their heads to you. So, if someone shouted “it’s an Earthquake!”, and people nearby felt it and tweeted, implying it was true, everyone in the auditorium would know about it. Of course, other types of messages were send in Twitter, but most importantly, actors and robots started to use Twitter to plainly shout lies and noise.

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      About 15 years ago, I moved to a city where I didn’t know anyone. I joined Twitter because I like to try new apps as early as possible. It turned out to be a great place to talk about live music in my city, amongst other things. I met all my friends on Twitter.

      At that time in my city, it was very much the town square that Elon wants it to be now. It was a place to discuss events in realtime; especially sporting events.

      I suspect the advantage for Twitter was that you could communicate with people you didn’t know directly like celebrities, authors, politicians, etc. Not just write to them, but they write back because sending off a short message is much easier than making a call or writing a letter. Sometimes that is an unhealthy parasocial relationship but, it doesn’t have to be.

      Kevin Smith basically started writing the movie Tusk in a collaborative way with Twitter.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      Small notes to be answered rarely.

      I’ve looked at the early Usenet archives, and typical posts there resembled this format quite a lot. It’s later that Usenet became a place where you write long considerate posts, and also expect rather quick answers.

      It’s actually interesting to communicate in a rare terse format.

      The reason I don’t use Twitter, BlueSky, anything like that is - I don’t have a scenario of it being useful for me.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Usenet to me seems more like Lemmy than anything else. All conversations are groups by topic, just like Lemmy. Although they are all just “text posts”.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I follow some economist guys, they are always sharing some graphs and chart data that help people to invest efficiently on the local stock market. Some talk to them and I follow the conversations as they are really interesting. But I don’t talk to them.

        • benni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Asking as a layman, isn’t it well established that the stock market is extremely efficient and that active trading underperforms (for the same risk level) passively buying the market? Or does this not apply to very local markets?

          • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Indeed. At least it does here in south America. Actually active trading is discouraged because you are always running after the price change.

            As you say, performance wise, you either go random or buying ETFs for good overall performers indexes, like s&p or the DOW

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Me too but here’s one useful function:

      Perhaps you are aware there is an ongoing event, say for example a football game, or an election, or an outage of your email service provider. You go to one of these “scream into the void” social sites, search on the topic, and learn what people are saying about it. Maybe someone knows what’s really going on, maybe some of those people have some interesting insights and you engage with them, not unlike you and I are engaging right now. Others can observe, perhaps contribute, and after the event has concluded, everyone goes their own way. Hopefully in the end the interactions are beneficial for all.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I thought it was a great idea for official statements. Kind of like a new type of RSS feed.

      Local transport companies can advertise delays, meteorology organisations can advertise natural disasters, police can post active missing person alerts, etc.

      But it seems like it is just vapid narcissists thinking other people give a shit about their random thoughts.

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree. I followed a couple of theaters, music venues, and bars to see what events were coming up and when happy hour was. I never understood the idea of following people just to hear what they were thinking every 15 seconds.

    • CoderSupreme@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      In an auditorium with everyone shouting you don’t get to hear anything. In Twitter you get to see what you want instead of what most people want like on reddit and Lemmy. I much prefer that to other people deciding for me. At least that way I can see something other than shitposts and US politics.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Agree, it’s like I had a feed for reading only instagram/facebook comments. No, thanks

    • Lizardking13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love it for sports stuff. This player is out today. Player was injured in the game and out for the remainder of the game. Records, stats, things like that are great for these mediums.

    • stellargmite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Me too. Tried twitter way back in the early days of it. Never found it useful. Others did though obviously, which I don’t understand, but they did. What I find interesting is the seeming need to replace it with something similar. Why? Is it like gradually kicking an addiction by switching to something slightly less bad, but not going full cold turkey?

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 month ago

        What I find interesting is the seeming need to replace it with something similar. Why?

        Oh yeah. Why? Yeah… yeah I could never imagine leaving one toxic social media and then trying to find a similar replacement…

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seems to me like you comprehend it perfectly!

      I also never really saw the appeal. And I closed the account I’d barely used since 2007 (When it was primarily for announcing you were pooping and Lifehacker told me you could make lists with remember the milk) when the first buddy bought it.

      I occasionally tried to use it for getting near real time news about things, but I guess I sucked at following the right people.

      Now, with privacy badger, I never have to interact even when sites embed xits (if we’re going with xitter, then it’s full of xits, right?).

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Depends how you use it. I follow artsy people and game devs and my feed is mostly just art and game dev related posts.

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Anyone try the bridge? Seems a bit convoluted.

    Anything that gets people off Twitter is a good thing. And it means more potential mastodon users later on ;)

        • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Not sure exactly what you’re asking, but it’s opt in.

          So since I opted in, my mastodon account is shown as a bluesky account on bluesky.

          But I can only follow bluesky accounts from mastodon if they’ve opted into the bridge, which seems to be a decent number, but still a small proportion. And the replies to my posts that are on bluesky, will only be visible to me from mastodon if the people replying have opted into the bridge.

          I’m not using mastodon much anyways, because there are too little people there who care about what I post, but I use a service to post which automatically posts on mastodon / bluesky (and until last week when i opted out, twitter), so I’ll still be posting to mastodon even though it’s only for a handful of people compared to my 8k bluesky followers.

          • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            It used to not require opt-in, but Mastodon users were strongly opposed to the idea of Mastodon actually being interoperable with other services and harassed the developer.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bridgy Fed is pretty straightforward. You just follow the account and away you go.

      It doesn’t make your bridged posts particularly attractive-looking (essentially you appear as a bot under a subdomain of a server), but it’s searchable and discoverable in the target network.

      I’m now mostly using Blue Sky, but I bridge to Mastodon, so all my posts form part of the content that’s available to fediverse users. For little old me that’s not all that important, but if every big organisation or journalist or celeb did that too, that’d do a lot to build vitality into the fediverse network.

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is there anything in Bluesky’s design that prevents the company from attracting a critical mass of users and then restricting federation, or cutting it off entirely?

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t think there are any other Instances aside from the default bsky.social‬ right now. It’s only federated in theory and essentially a closed platform until that changes. Pretty sad that it gets all the attention instead of Mastodon.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m not even sure what the word is to describe that mentality. The closest I think of is “willfully ignorant”, but that’s not quite it.

        Basically people like you are blind to the reason as to why bluesky and not mastodon is getting all the twitter runaways.

        And you’re blind to it, not because you’re incapable of seeing the reasons. You’re just unwilling to accept that those reasons ARE the reasons it’s happening this way.

        Basically the 95% of society don’t give a shit about federation. It’s not a selling point, it’s a scary confusing distraction. Many of them probably went to sign up for mastodon, as they had heard of it…but then they found out:

        “There are thousands of mastodons, and if you sign up on one, you can’t sign up on the other, and you can only talk to the people on your mastodon…oh, bluesky is just one service. You sign up, and you’re done. Oh, it’s even asking me if I want to connect with mastodon. So that means I never needed to connect to mastodon! And this one is just like twitter. I know this. The other one is scary. This one is what I like.”

        And then you come in, correcting every wrong aspect of what they just said. You start using terms like fediverse, and instances, and federate, and they just give you blank stares.

        They don’t give a shit about that. At all. At allllll. At allllllllllll.

        I’m going to include a picture here. I took a picture of my wall while I was watching a hockey game. You’ll notice their twitter handles. But those handles are also accessable all across the net. That’s how the fediverse should work.

        TonyBrownpxp. You’ll notice they don’t put the X logo in that graphic. They just put the handle, and assume the audience knows what to do. Now, Tony Brown isn’t a celebrity. He’s a hockey announcer for a Cleveland based AHL hockey team, the Cleveland Monsters. AHL is the farm system for NHL. So this is minor league hockey.

        Hardley someone who anyone would instantly know the name Tony Brown. However, if you’re watching hockey, and you see the handle @TonyBrownPXP with no other context, as shown in this photo, you know how to contact them.

        But, if he were to say, have a mastodon, it would have to be @TonyBrownPXP@mastodon.social

        And furthermore, if @TonyBrownPXP@mastodon.world exists, that means you can’t just throw @TonyBrownPXP on the screen with a mastodon logo, because which @TonyBrownPXP IS it???

        And so now your screenis just FILLED with text, all because handles aren’t handled universally on the fediverse. I’m personally signed up for 3 diffeeent fediverse services, all using Lost_My_Mind, but on 3 different instances. What if a 2nd person signs up Lost_My_Mind on a 4th instance? I have no way to prove that’s not me. And I don’t think anyone gives a shit enough about me to investigate if it WAS me. So anything they say, would in the minds of humans, be assosiated with me.

        And while I won’t call TonyBrown a celebrity, it’s the same for celebrities, and guys like him. He encourages fan interaction during hockey games, and he refuses to call it X. He always says “Send your thoughts or questions to me on twitter, or I guess they call it X now, which is a stupid name, but send your questions to @TonyBrownPXP and we’ll address the best ones during game breaks and intermission!”

        Says almost the same exact thing, almost word for word, always with the snide diss of twitter, every game.

        Now I’ve never signed up for loops, or pixelfed, or peertube, or a lot of services. But when I signed up for the fediverse, it should have had me pick a username. Lost_My_Mind. Ok, now when I sign up to any service, Lemmy, or Pixelfed, or peertube, or anything else, Lost_My_Mind should be my handle.

        And if someone ELSE tries signing up for Pixelfed, on a different instance, they can’t use Lost_My_Mind. Even though I don’t have a registered pixelfed account. Even though I don’t have an account on that other instance.

        I’M Lost_My_Mind. Not you on another instance. But that’s not how the fediverse works. And because people don’t understand, or give a shit about any of that, they just go with what they know.

        Right now, we’re in the early days of the fediverse. The experience should be centralized, while the underlaying services and protocols should be decentralized. Because right now, the whole thing isn’t decentralized. It’s fractured.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 month ago

          Basically people like you are blind to the reason as to why bluesky and not mastodon is getting all the twitter runaways.

          Bluesky absolutely provides a better, more cohesive and centralised experience than most of the fediverse microblog alternatives.

          That’s why it’s getting more people

          But the reason it can do that is because it’s centralised, with federation tacked on. And that centralisation means it’s most likely going to go through the same cycle of enshittification as twitter, facebook, reddit etc. Twitter was great to use back in the day. Reddit was great to use back in the day. Then they got large captive audiences that couldn’t leave because of the network effect, and instead of trying to make the platforms attractive to new people, they started to bleed their existing customers for value at the expense of their user experience, because those people had nowhere else they could easily go.

          Bluesky will go down that same path if they get a critical mass of users and stop being the “alternative” to twitter.

          Mastodon and the fediverse will always be an alternative at best, because they can’t compete with the experience of using a centralised network. But the Fediverse platforms don’t suffer from the vulnerability of centralised networks and their path to enshittification. And for me, that’s going to keep me here.

          The only way I’ll move to Bluesky is if they truly embrace decentralisation to the point where the platform/network could exist without them.

          • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I’m with you.

            I think GP has one or two good points about shortcomings of the existing distributed platforms, but I also think these things can be addressed. For example, a centralized system’s single namespace for usernames brings advantages for both identity and usability. This would be harder for a distributed system to implement, of course, but it’s not impossible.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s why it’s getting more people

            They are getting more people because they are paying them and in bed with corporations.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Bluesky absolutely provides a better, more cohesive and centralised experience than most of the fediverse microblog alternatives.

            That’s why it’s getting more people

            That’s BS, they’re only getting more people 'cos normies never heard of the fediverse, maybe once or twice about mastodon and couldn’t be arsed to try a fringe app “nobody” uses anyway - it’s liek email? What?

            Plus their two techie friends are moving to Bluesky so it must be good.

        • witten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Look, I appreciate you pushing on the UX aspects of the fediverse here. But let me ask yout something. What’s your email address? Is it Lost_My_Mind? No? Oh, because it’s got an @whatever.com on the end? Why is that? Why don’t we have one global, centralized namespace for email usernames such that there’s only a single Lost_My_Mind in the whole world?

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You do realize Bluesky also tacks on .bsky.social? (Though with a dot instead of a second @)

          And even without other instances, ATProto already allows people to sign up using domains they own.

          The closest you can get to using Lost_My_Mind as you Bluesky handle is by aquiring a domain like lost_my_mind.com. And that still wouldn’t prevent someone else from signing up using lost_my_mind.net.

          And that’s before pointing out that Impersonation and mistaken identities isn’t a solved problem on twitter, either.

          Bluesky is succeeding because its a smooth and familiar experience that obfuscates away the complexity of how it works.

          Absolutely nothing about how the ActivityPub network works conceptually prevents it from being an equally smooth experience, given the work were put in.

          Your first six paragraphs hit the mark, but the following rant about the “username univerasility problem” ain’t it.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          So OIDC for ActivityPub.

          I like it. That is absolutely how Mastodon and Fediverse in general should have been prepared for the X-odus. But instead it all ends up over at Bluesky where it will inevitably turn to dogshit.

              • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                I don’t know what tailscale is, but based on the context, it sounds like what I mean. As long as it’s handling JUST the handles.

                Because realistically, from a computer perspective I would still be @Lost_My_Mind@Lemmy.World from a purely technical behind the scenes standpoint.

                All my posts, and such would be hosted on Lemmy.World but from a human perspective, I would just be @Lost_My_Mind

                So if you mention me, or message me, you’d be using @Lost_My_Mind but the technicals would take that handle, and say "ok, where do I deliver this? Ah, yes, it’s registered at @Lost_My_Mind@Lemmy.World

                So thats where the computers would deliver that message. Even though you, the user, don’t even need to know which instance I’m registered at. No need to display that. Make it FEEL centralized, while actually making it decentralized.

      • Kalkaline @leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mastodon is fine, but I burned out on it pretty quick. There’s not an intuitive way to find new content on there. I’m sure the content is fine, but Bluesky can get you up and running really quickly.

        • maplebar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ve found tons of new “content” on Mastodon by following hashtags related to the things I like.

          Personally I like the fact that I’m not being fed some corporate algorithm.

          • ominouslemon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I like the fact that I’m not being fed some corporate algorithm.

            Bluesky’s entire appeal for me is that you can choose (or even create) your recommendation algorithm. Not only it’s an amazing idea, it also works really well

            • maplebar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 month ago

              Sure, that’s definitely nice in theory.

              In practice, however, because the client is closed source and there’s no way to self-host and instance, BlueSky users will eventually find themselves at the whims of the people/person who controls the software. What’s to stop some Elon Musk type from buying BlueSky next and then adding things to your algorithm without your consent?

              That’s why I’m very skeptical of BlueSky’s pseudo-federation, as it feels like people are just making the same mistakes (with regard to corporate social media) over and over again. Unlike Mastodon (which I understand is less popular right now and thus the network/peer effect is weaker for people), the users have very little control over BlueSky as a platform, and that feels like a mistake.

              With all that said, priority numero uno should simply be to get people off of shit like X.com and TikTok, which aren’t just at risk of becoming toxic playgrounds of oligarchs, but already are. If people choose BlueSky as the next corporate platform to go to, it’s a small step in the right direction, but it’s worth proceeding with caution.

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There’s not an intuitive way to find new content on there.

          Just follow hashtags.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mastedon and the Fediverse need to get their shit together and make it easy for hyper casual basic people to use and understand.

        Bluesky doesn’t have any of that.

      • joelghill@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not quite true. You can host your own personal data store (PDS), run your own labelling service, and you can host your own feeds.

        The big relays and app views are the only thing that aren’t really supported by the official app yet.

    • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Despite being “open source”, if you want to run your own Personal Data Sever, to join the network you’ll need to join Bluesky’s AT Protocol PDS Admins Discord server:

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        That would effectively lock participation behind Discord’s terms and conditions. No thanks.

        (But thanks for sharing that info. :)

        • Asuka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          I mean, it’s kind of silly to lock it behind Discord, but just forcing admits to have a Discord account isn’t that egregious. You’re not forced to use it outside of communicating with Bluesky admins (or whatever goes on in that server).

      • Brgor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t know how old this document is, but I created my own PDS this weekend and it’s not have to join their Discord server to do so.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bluesky is centralised and funded by VCs. It plays at being decentralised because people can bring their own hardware to the party and plugin to the Bluesky network, but if Bluesky (the company) turns it off, then Bluesky the platform/network ceases to be usable. They also started without allowing federation with their core network, so they can easily disable it again at any time.

      Bluesky is not decentralised in any meaningful way, which means its at risk of the same bullshit that has driven most of us away from reddit, twitter, facebook etc

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure, but the network itself is still there and still running, and I can still use it (albeit with some disruption).

          The point is though, that as long as it’s not dependent on a single instance, enshittification isn’t the inevitable end state.

          And for me, despite the usability issues of the fediverse instance based method, it’s a better alternative than joining and losing another social media network to gradual enshittification and slack moderation

        • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not like my account is that important. I have the same account on different instances so when one has technical problems, I just use the other. Just copied the settings over. Not like I need to be able to go through all my history much.

      • joelghill@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not centralized, it’s also not a federated network like AP. It’s just a different design.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Two different questions.

      They are a gateway to federated material as any other (like Lemmy), and those controls are at the platform. They can gatekeep federated content very simply.

      There is nothing stopping them from leaving it all open aside from costs though. Hosting is very expensive, and I’m not sure how they plan to support their platform aside from advertising, at which point you may be stuck in a spot where you shut down certain intersections to appease advertisers.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        They currently have no plans for advertisement.

        On what they’re currently planning to bring in money:

        https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/24/24278666/bluesky-working-on-premium-subscription

        That could change at any time, but seems likely to be true for now.

        I would guess things will be fine at least up until they either IPO or they get bought by a VC firm or some public corp. That’s the point in the ensuing to fixation cycle to move to something else (unless something unexpected happens like they really do nicely federate before then or something else that may save the platform).

        So I’m guessing probably at least a couple years that it’ll be good, and it’s 10000x better than Xitter.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh my god! That’s terrible! 20 million people!?

    What have they ever done to Bluesky!? Why would Bluesky go out of its way to hit so many people!?

  • Babalugats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    The urge to act like an asshole on another platform is just too much…

    Twitter was a cesspool long before trump, and it was made such by the same people trying to distance themselves from it now.

    “Ohh… I wasn’t a cunt on Twitter, I’m one of the people moving away from it”.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      All that matters is the cesspool that isn’t going to make Musk any money

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except on Bluesky you create your own algorithm. You’re not rage-baited by an algorithm that exists to “maximise engagement”, and although spam bots exist on Bluesky, they have virtually no reach.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I won’t be joining in until I can actually run a real instance on my own.

    I don’t plan on doing that, but the important part is knowing that I could.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Instances are run through a central “relay” which is controlled by Bluesky HQ, so it isn’t decentralized like, say, Mastodon is.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I know.

        ATproto has some interesting advantages, and eventually the idea is for anyone to be able to host any microservice component of the network, including relays other than the one run by Bluesky.

        The relays don’t need to be centralized. They are indexers that provide functionality to others parts of the ATproto network.

        The problem is that there isn’t really any incentive to do so… Any additional instances or new apps running ATproto can just rely on the one big indexer provided by Bluesky, instead of running each microservice component themselves.

          • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            No.

            But they don’t need to be. They’re essentially just indexers.

            If two relays index all the same content, then any services using either will be “interconnected” in the sense that any users can see each other and interact with each other.

            Each relay host can choose what parts of the network they want to index, and as far as I can tell, any services could use multiple relays if they like.

  • Praxis@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Damn I sure hope they’re gonna pay compensation for all the users they hit

  • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    Such a letdown, I had hoped that with the downfall of Twitter people would finally kick their addictions to vapid trash media.

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just “secured” my handle there. It’s unlikely I’ll become a frequent user/poster, but who knows…

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Interesting choice for the thumbnail picture. That was pre-butterfly logo. That picture is several months old.

    • mosscap@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The butterfly logo is one of the greatest things about that company, especially after Bad Man #2 decided to kill the beautiful bird logo. What an absolute waste that was.

  • tentaclius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tried it, still prefer Mastadon. The amount of shitposts or unrelated posts is incomparable to that of meta’s threads, but still quite high to my taste.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s not that many bots yet and people are big into blocking (and you can subscribe to block lists so it’s automatic). I’m sure as it grows, bot traffic will too — it’s seemingly inevitable — but 20 million users isn’t really that much compared to legacy platforms. I think is mostly news because lots of people are fleeing X due to the election.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seems likely to be very low so far.

      Although it’s getting enough attention lately that this may change.