David Gerard@awful.systemsM to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 years agoyour Bayesian yacht is an outlier adn should not be countedwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up132arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-linkyour Bayesian yacht is an outlier adn should not be countedwww.nytimes.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square27linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareswlabr@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 years agoOk so if hubris somehow becomes a synonym of bayes I’d be all for it
minus-squareDavid Gerard@awful.systemsOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agobayesian epistemology for sure
minus-squareColl@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·2 years agoWell naive bayesianism, as practiced by the rationalists. Bayesianism itself can be reformed to get rid of most its problems, though I’ve yet to see a good solution for the absent-minded driver problem.
Ok so if hubris somehow becomes a synonym of bayes I’d be all for it
bayesian epistemology for sure
Well naive bayesianism, as practiced by the rationalists. Bayesianism itself can be reformed to get rid of most its problems, though I’ve yet to see a good solution for the absent-minded driver problem.