• LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Why should this be different than the US or EU funding open source, either directly or through universities, corporations, and NGOs that often intersect with the military “industrial” financial complex?

        Try to explain why it’s different rather than pointing to their nationality and going “well, see???”

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because Russia is under sanctions. They would have to take everything into there own hands which means they would basically have a separate project.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            they would basically have a separate project.

            That’s what a fork is. Happens all the time.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              It really doesn’t happen all the time. It is pretty rare for a fork to be successful especially if most of the development is still happening on the original project. I don’t see Russia having much success with this.

          • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh sure we agree then, was just minigun full auto posting. It’s going to be completely separate from the financial system that has most open source development under its thumb, I find that exciting.