Five@slrpnk.net to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 26 days agoGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down15cross-posted to: lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up1109arrow-down1external-linkGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukFive@slrpnk.net to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squareMaalus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down1·26 days agoWas there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·25 days agoHence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
minus-squareMaalus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·25 days agoYeah, the basic laws for privacy.
Was there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
I mean probably yeah.
Hence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
Yeah, the basic laws for privacy.