• Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I wasn’t a fan of the format. (and apparently I’m not allowed to have an opinion on format)

              • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                The ad revenue part is true but what do you mean by not harvesting data? Mastodon definitely stores your boosts and likes, it just doesn’t use that data to recommend more content. And the big difference is of course that it is stored on your instance’s server, not a centralized location.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m not OP, but yes, that’s why I don’t use Mastodon or Twitter/X. I really don’t like the format.

            I tried to give Twitter a fair shake several years ago, and I found it to be a complete waste of my time. So I don’t use it, or anything like it. That’s also around when I found Reddit, which I found to not be a complete waste of time, and that’s why I’m on Lemmy instead of Mastodon. I like following communities, not topics or people.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s centralized. They allow federation using their own protocol.

      But all you need to know is that it’s a capitalist, for-profit undertaking.

    • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      When it’s built around lage aggregators, running which privately is rather hard, there’s a bias in favour of centralised, large operators thereof, which mitigates some of the advantages.