• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t think it should’ve been opt-out, but Mozilla’s ad metrics development is very much the direction ads on the web should go in. It is impossible to determine who you are from the data. They’ve truly done a good job on creating an ad model that’s privacy friendly, and would be a material improvement to the web.

      It’s a way to still have ad revenue funding the content we all consume, while also still maintaining privacy. It’s a good thing. It’s just the opt-out aspect for existing installs that’s bad.

      That said, I’m personally a proponent of just using adblock lol

      • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I also use adblocking at multiple levels so it wasn’t a huge thing for me (been blocking Pocket and other bullshit for years at the dns and network levels) but I still feel like Mozilla witnessed Google going for broke with killing mv2 and inline ads on YouTube and decided wellll our existing users probably wouldn’t notice or care if we slipped in an opt-out fuckery… But we did. Immediately.

        For any browser trying to sell itself as “the only privacy browser on the market” this was a dumb fucking move by any metric. Like why not just openly admit we’re going with the Brave browser model?

      • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        No it’s not. But if we’re hoping Firefox will be better in some way we’d expect more from them. Wouldn’t we?