• Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Whatever an arbitrary reader of this comment thinks about copyright law – If they don’t defend their copyright, they can lose it. It’s kind of a necessity for them to defend it in this manner.

      Today, I was stupid.

  • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Doesn’t Scholastic have the book and IP copyright? WB only has copyright on their movies, which diverge from the books in minor ways.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m assuming they probably used movie IP in their signage or something. It’s shitty, but companies have to defend their trademarks or risk losing them.

      • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re right the library might try claiming Harry Potter as their own intellectual property. Can’t have that

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        30 days ago

        You know what they say about assumptions.

        The article suggests that the cease-and-desist was related to copyright. A public library’s education initiative should be covered by fair use. It’s unclear what WB are up to except showing their asses.

        In any event, if I were Teton County’s head librarian, it would be a cold day in hell before I’d cooperate with WB’s free publicity events again. I’d likely refuse to buy any book they might have an interest in as well.