When asked about the federal government’s role, 41% of Americans say it should encourage the production of nuclear power.

Let’s get those new construction contracts signed!

  • lntl@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did it ever occur to you that you come off like as asshole?

    I don’t get this part:

    evidenced by 67500t being consumed to produce 9EJ in a year

    followed by this part:

    Do that 90 times and you have produced 810EJ or a little over 1.3 years of primary energy.

    It sounds like your mixing up 90 years of power with 1.3 years of primary energy. (Also why are you now comparing to primary energy? You made a stink about this earlier.) The answer is beginning to look more like 100 years if we only mine virgin stuff (no recycling of fuel, no dismantling of weapons grade fuel, etc).

    Where is your “a few years”? You don’t mean using the electricity produced as primary energy do you?

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re getting not respecting you and being an asshole confused. You need to earn respect by not pulling idiotic word games.

      Just like you can’t comprehend the distinction between electricity and energy,

      And I don’t have to use your tortured intentionally wrong methodology.

      6e6 tonnes. 80-100TJ/tonne in an SMR or 140TJ/tonne in a LWR. 300EJ of final energy per year. 6e6 * 140e12 / 300e18 = 2.8 years.

      Very simple. There aren’t tens of millions of tonnes of weapons grade U or spent fuel lying around so both are irrelevant.

      You’re attempting to start that gish gallop about breeding and re-encrichment again. Both are irrelevant to the topic.