• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    7 days ago

    Under those rules, streaming services that are not Canadian-owned and have more than CAD $25 million (approx. USD $18.5 million)  in revenue in Canada annually are required to pay 5% of that revenue into funds that subsidize Canadian content and creators.

    Under that plan, 1.5% of music streamers’ revenue would go towards subsidies for local radio stations.

    Lol, yea, pay your fucking taxes, grifters.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sure. That just means that Canadian consumers of Spotify will be indirectly subsidizing Canadian artists.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I see no problem here.

          Well, assuming you see having domestic content as a valid goal, anyway, which isn’t necessarily a given.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sure but then they pay more taxes. Increase in price means more revenue which means more taxes. It’s just a circle.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Interesting that they’re pumping back money into traditional radio.

      The letter argued that Canada’s radio regulations were designed to address the problems created by its vast geography, its “linguistic duality” (English and French), and the fact that space on analog radio is limited, making decisions about what gets broadcast necessary.

      Gee, that’s not the history I remember. I’m not super familiar, but wasn’t it about holding back Americanisation? (We have radio band allocations separately)