• JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    The president can’t intervene at the state level. From americanbar.org:

    A U.S. president has broad but not unlimited powers to pardon. For example, a president cannot pardon someone for a state crime.

      • JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The president’s “official act” would be issuing the pardon. The referenced Supreme Court decision just means it would not be a “crime” for the president to issue said pardon, not that the pardon would stand.

        • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s true, so I guess it would need to be having the military intervene to extract him, so that you don’t need to worry about what a state court says.

        • 5C5C5C@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The official act could be to use the national guard to rescue a US citizen from wrongful imprisonment, but that’s the kind of thing that racist Republicans would start a civil war over in the name of “states’ rights”.