Archive link here: https://archive.ph/mwFp9
Is the Royal Statistical Society debasing itself by pouring doubt on our judicial system, or is there something to it?
Archive link here: https://archive.ph/mwFp9
Is the Royal Statistical Society debasing itself by pouring doubt on our judicial system, or is there something to it?
I think the subtext of it was that she could have been a victim of a miscarriage of justice if this one piece of evidence was invalidated. However from reading about the case it just seems like on piece of circumstantial evidence as opposed to the lynchpin for the case.