• citrusface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sorry, I missed the mobile part of your statement

    For mobile I would recommend duckduckgo private browser.

          • citrusface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            welp, thats that. oh well. i can be wrong - all good.

            it doesnt matter really because i cant develop a browser and i have to use what exists - i choose duckduckchrome.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              It does matter, because Firefox exists, and you’re free to choose that one too. If you know about the underlying tech your decision is more informed.

              • citrusface@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                im not going to pretend im smart enough to understand the backend difference between safari/chrome/firefox - firefox mobile hasnt been a great experience for me, but i dont use the browser on my phone all that much. at home, its vivalidi because it works well. im not knocking firefox, its been my go to browser for over a decade - but its been seemingly backed by google this whole time? i dont know.

                • Crismus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  Google paying Mozilla for search placement is the same as Google paying Samsung and Apple for search priority on their phones.

                  It doesn’t mean that Google is backing Mozilla, Apple, and Samsung.

                  Mozilla has to take a much smaller cut compared to Apple because of their size, nothing else.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  If you’re on iPhone there is no difference in the tech under the hood, because apple only allows webkit. Anything besides Safari is essentially Safari with a skin. The difference in tech is rarely the issue though. It’s the monopolistic practices of Google and apple that should concern us

                  • citrusface@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    100% agree and what I was trying to get to - it’s the tech monopolies that are the issue here.

                    And I’m on pixel6a - so it’s Google anyway.