• qprimed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    couple of points.

    1. I hit the site on mobile with the usual browser shields up and everything on the linked page worked with zero effort
    2. lite on detail

    lovely that the site is likely to work for the lowest common denominator modern browser - I mean seriouly that could scare up a few hundred distracted voter ballots in a tight race.

    I am not the target audience for this platform presentation, but it was clean, with tight easily digestible copy and smooth delivery. if I were an “undecided” but turned off by “those two wierd dudes”, I could possibly see myself clicking with this.

    so policy sparse, likable generic democrat it is - reasonable angle for her to take because I think she can actually ride the feelz into the whitehouse.

    however, everyone disgusted by the last 44 years* of world history better have their hopium / copium handy.

    * time began when ronnie squelched his way into the WH

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Glad she mentions climate change, but nothing about dismantling the US military, which is an enormous polluter. Also the nuclear arsenal is a bigger threat to all life if earth. No mention of it.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not even going to watch the debate. I don’t want to see two conservatives fight about who can do more damage to the left than the other.

    …perhaps if the moderator would actually ask important questions