Go ahead and reply again putting words in my mouth and then write a couple paragraphs about how great of a person you are and how you’d never do anything so low.
lmao. I’m not a great person. I’m just not simping for murdering civilians, unlike you.
Right, Pugjesus the pacifist. You’ve changed me, if only both sides would reject violence, the problem would be solved!
If you leave right now you can make it just in time to give this message to both leaders and stop all of this!
Do you want to take my butt spanking paddle with you?
Seriously though, did I break your brain? Not having a better solution does not equal simping for murdering civilians. Does that work? If you really think that the people who committed the attack on October 7th are any different than you and I, then I can’t help you.
You are the one treating people like children on both sides. You pass judgment without having been involved, which makes your judement worthless, which is why I’m calling it virtue signaling. The only thing you get from this is now people know Pugjesus is anti-murder, whatever thats supposed to mean.
I’m saying not to judge people you don’t understand, in situations you’ve never experienced. Of course violence is wrong buy if everyone who felt that way never committed violence then the world would be incredibly safe. Normal people can be pushed to extremes, and this is why people aren’t focusing on the attack on the 7th and instead talking about before and after.
Seriously though, did I break your brain? Not having a better solution does not equal simping for murdering civilians.
Let me reiterate:
If you think targeting civilians in ethnic cleansing isn’t doing it wrong because you prefer their side of the conflict, we have nothing to talk about. Your position is no different than the excuses given by the Zionists.
Murder is bad. I don’t know what a better answer for that conflict is. I’ll call it the wrong choice once someone figures out what the right one was. If thats simping to you then oh well.
I don’t know what a better answer for that conflict is.
Goodness, if only there was some kind of distinction between combatants and non-combatants that was generally accepted as valid. I guess we’ll never know anything like that, though, we have to target civilians.
lmao. I’m not a great person. I’m just not simping for murdering civilians, unlike you.
Right, Pugjesus the pacifist. You’ve changed me, if only both sides would reject violence, the problem would be solved!
If you leave right now you can make it just in time to give this message to both leaders and stop all of this!
Do you want to take my butt spanking paddle with you?
Seriously though, did I break your brain? Not having a better solution does not equal simping for murdering civilians. Does that work? If you really think that the people who committed the attack on October 7th are any different than you and I, then I can’t help you.
You are the one treating people like children on both sides. You pass judgment without having been involved, which makes your judement worthless, which is why I’m calling it virtue signaling. The only thing you get from this is now people know Pugjesus is anti-murder, whatever thats supposed to mean.
I’m saying not to judge people you don’t understand, in situations you’ve never experienced. Of course violence is wrong buy if everyone who felt that way never committed violence then the world would be incredibly safe. Normal people can be pushed to extremes, and this is why people aren’t focusing on the attack on the 7th and instead talking about before and after.
Let me reiterate:
Have a nice day simping for genocide.
Murder is bad. I don’t know what a better answer for that conflict is. I’ll call it the wrong choice once someone figures out what the right one was. If thats simping to you then oh well.
Goodness, if only there was some kind of distinction between combatants and non-combatants that was generally accepted as valid. I guess we’ll never know anything like that, though, we have to target civilians.
Whatever makes you feel better man.