• Shanedino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sure two additional cases not that bad, now just keep adding them up. Like anything security related it’s not 100% perfect you just have to make it annoying to break.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Meanwhile mathematicians working on cryptography: the universe will die before you get even 10% chance of cracking encryption.

      Security by obscurity is no security.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        No. Security through obscurity is bad security, but it’s still an additional layer. And since there’s literally no way to 100% ensure that a machine is being controlled by a human, there’s literally no other way except saying “fuck it” and not doing any security at all.