I keep thinking this would have been a much better sell to devs and to users. I have always used Sync, and Boost. I tried the official app a few times, but really only used it for the chat feature. I didn’t want to pay for it, but (I am embarrassed to admit it) I would pay premium to keep my app. I think this would have worked out better for Reddit than the garbage they are pulling right now.

Would that have been a more reasonable solution in your opinion as well?

  • Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hah, no. Are you asking if I want to pay for access to a platform that is already dependant on its users to create or aggregate content, while they are already making ad money off my eyeballs? Heck, no, never. If that site cannot make enough money on ads alone, while being one /were of the most visited non-porn sites on the internet, then maybe they should reconsider their other expenses. E.x. Is it really necessary to have a downtown office in an expensive us city, or pay out high CEO wages. I can only really conclude that they are being stupid about this. If they want me back, they are going to have to beg.

  • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t have paid for, but i would have accepted much better. “API usage is ad free hence only premium users can access it” is much better than “API users are freeloaders that take more than they are giving, fuck them!”

    • Anonymous0573@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did he actually say that? What is it with all of these rich people and being brain dead. I make dumb decisions too, where’s my money?

  • FrickAndMortar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Three weeks ago, I totally would have… Apollo was life! Now, I don’t think anything could lure me back…

    With Spez’s comments about how Reddit has all this data, and “we’re not going to just give that away for free”, I think anyone left on that platform is going to get sold so hard to anyone with two nickels to rub together, that they will effectively have zero privacy or anonymity… no thanks, Spez.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Had they come out and said “hey guys, we really need to actually be making money here. We know it’s not ideal, but itll allow us to further invest in the site and its community”, there really wouldn’t have been a fuss. Sure people would have been upset, but most would’ve gotten it.

      Instead they have to act like petulant children throwing a temper tantrum when they don’t get exactly what they want exactly when they want it.

  • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would have IF it had been the solution Reddit had came up with in the first place AND they hadn’t destroyed my trust in them with their handling of the protests.

    I have an issue with your proposed solution though: it does not address the use case of moderation / accessibility / utility tools and bots.

  • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would have considered that at the start, but at this point they’ve damaged their ecosystem so much, and correspondingly Lemmy has grown a lot, so I don’t see why I would go back either way.

  • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No reddit is dead to me. Anything that is used by ceos to fuck over the people. Let it burn for all I care.

    Actually scratch that. Let it pump to obscene levels and after all those rich riches have bought in. Dump that thing into the Earth’s core.

    Far too much money and corruption in this world.

  • Burndown@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, the reason I left Reddit last week has little to do with with third party app issue. I left because the CEO has shown he isn’t interested in listening or addressing community concerns.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. He’s just another arrogant authoritarian who doesn’t understand where Reddit’s value comes from. It’s the users who will decide if Reddit survives or not, NOT the CEO’s. We’ve seen this attitude before. Hollywood has been destroying franchises for years because they think they know better than the fans.