0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前Fuck-up Assessment Formsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1612arrow-down19
arrow-up1603arrow-down1imageFuck-up Assessment Formsh.itjust.works0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前message-square54fedilink
minus-squareNicht BurningTurtle@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 个月前What is the problem with using BTRFS for rootfs?
minus-squareEngywuck@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·3 个月前I think that this form is actually old, from when BTRFS was quite unstable. That point on the list made me chuckle.
minus-squarecheet@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 个月前It tends to break when you force power off the machine in my experience, where ext4 is super resilient to that kind of stuff. Thats my experience at least.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 个月前Ext4 can’t detect data corruption while btrfs can. Btrfs has only bee stable for a handful of years now. It had way to many early adopters that were burned
What is the problem with using BTRFS for rootfs?
I think that this form is actually old, from when BTRFS was quite unstable. That point on the list made me chuckle.
It tends to break when you force power off the machine in my experience, where ext4 is super resilient to that kind of stuff.
Thats my experience at least.
Ext4 can’t detect data corruption while btrfs can. Btrfs has only bee stable for a handful of years now. It had way to many early adopters that were burned