Of course if Microsoft undermines standards’ interoperability…
Why would anyone use Apache open office over Libreoffice? Also where onlyoffice?
Super.
All are great. Except : Inkscape is decent, except that it’s nowhere near illustrator. It’s got issues. Issues that maybe casual users can tolerate. A more demanding user won’t.
Gimp really isnt a substitute for photoshop. It’s slow, unstable and ux is dogshit. Too bad.
There are people saying Inkscape is better. I personally find it completely hard and unintuitive, just like GIMP. But I use both
Gimp is all I know, I can’t compare to Photoshop, and I love it! ❤️
Heard someone mentioned boxy, haven’t tried but looks good.
If you are interested in audio engineering I would recommend Ardour.
I’ve also heard good things about bitwig, though it’s not FOSS, annoyingly.
And it’s not just for Windows. That’s pretty much a list of the default choices for my operating system.
I agree these are alternatives, although for the larger solutions, I would argue that none of them are comparable for professional users, besides maybe Blender. I know many animators that use it, but it’s more like a tool for a specific purpose, while they also simultaneously use many other proprietary programs.
In addition to Joplin, Logseq is really great too, though with more of a text-first, outline based, zettle approach.
So… op complains about Microsoft’s interoperability standards, and then proceeds to post a list of apps which mostly use their own too 😂
There’s a lot of good software in there… but misleading caption…
The big difference is that formats used in open source software is open source.