TehBamski@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agoControversial Thesisi.imgur.comimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down126
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1imageControversial Thesisi.imgur.comTehBamski@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-squareazuth@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·3 months agoWhy do you think OP is not aware that there are costs to be paid but merely disagrees with using sports as a way to pay for it? You even used the word Utopian. Well most universities are not financed via sports even non public ones. Far from Utopian.
minus-squarewitx@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-23 months ago A society which charges students to acquire knowledge values neither. Because this is literally what he said. He never mentioned sports, just charging in general. I understand his sentiment, but it’s not practical.
minus-squareazuth@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoIt is practical; Wholely tax funded universities do not charge students.
minus-squarewitx@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-23 months agoYes I think we both agree with that. It was a misinterpretation on my part of OP arguments: no charging at all vs charging students
Why do you think OP is not aware that there are costs to be paid but merely disagrees with using sports as a way to pay for it?
You even used the word Utopian. Well most universities are not financed via sports even non public ones. Far from Utopian.
Because this is literally what he said. He never mentioned sports, just charging in general.
I understand his sentiment, but it’s not practical.
It is practical; Wholely tax funded universities do not charge students.
Yes I think we both agree with that. It was a misinterpretation on my part of OP arguments: no charging at all vs charging students