psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoYet more examples of how copyright destroys culture rather than driving itwalledculture.orgexternal-linkmessage-square70linkfedilinkarrow-up1291arrow-down115cross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.comnews@lemmy.worldnewyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1276arrow-down1external-linkYet more examples of how copyright destroys culture rather than driving itwalledculture.orgpsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square70linkfedilinkcross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.comnews@lemmy.worldnewyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·2 years agoNo, because OP clearly believes all copyright is bad while your corrected title would be at least some/most copyright has proven to be bad.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·2 years agoEh. Belief doesn’t really override logical fallacies. I know. In being pendantic, but I hate misleading headlines, especially when its a statistic. If it’s a beleif the author should state that.
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·2 years agoYou can say they’re incorrect, but you cannot correct their intentions. Only they can do that.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoThere is no logical fallacy. It also is not a statistic. 🤷🏼♀️
No, because OP clearly believes all copyright is bad while your corrected title would be at least some/most copyright has proven to be bad.
Eh. Belief doesn’t really override logical fallacies. I know. In being pendantic, but I hate misleading headlines, especially when its a statistic.
If it’s a beleif the author should state that.
You can say they’re incorrect, but you cannot correct their intentions. Only they can do that.
There is no logical fallacy.
It also is not a statistic. 🤷🏼♀️