• Gigagoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      6 months ago

      It communicates “you aren’t disabled, you have no excuse for acting like it, start choosing to use the fully functional brain you have”.

      look, if this doesn’t make you see how it’s a shitty thing to say, i don’t think anyone else can help you understand.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        6 months ago

        i appreciate how they admitted it out loud: “but how can i harrass people and call them unintelligent if the r-slur is unacceptable?”

        what about dont call people unintelligent. hm?

        • ealoe@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          6 months ago

          What is wrong with calling people unintelligent when they are doing unintelligent things that are directly causing me problems (for example, people on their phones blowing through red lights?) If someone tries to change lanes into me and I say “are you blind? You almost hit me!” is that similarly bad?

              • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                6 months ago

                The main issue that seems to be the disconnect is simply that you are using the word as an insult.

                Calling someone unintelligent is fine (I feel at least) but specifically using words that are associated with disabled people as an insult towards abled people is blatantly putting one group on top of the other.

                The insult in that case cuts both ways. The person you are directly talking to is insulted because they are acting like a “lower group” and you’re also insulting the entire group by saying they are inherently lesser.

                You can not use a group of people as an insult without inherently viewing that group as insult worthy.

                • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  This really focuses on the darkest possible aspects of people. I think I finally get why I’m not offended by the same things folks like you are.

                  I hear someone use a word like this, and I think “they are using an obvious example they saw, and applying it here in a deliberately facetious manner”. You hear the same word, and you think “that person is deliberately denegrating an entire group of people.”

                  You’re not going to like my saying so, but neither approach is always right or wrong here. There are people that absolutely are doing what you think they are. What your stance doesn’t seem to accept, however, is that others are not.

                  You can live your life any way you wish, but I think people who think this way may want to take a step back, and maybe put their swords down. White Knights don’t always do well in a grey world.

                  • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Intent doesn’t really matter if the entire butt of the joke is that this person is asking like a “lesser” group.

                    Even if intent did matter… How would a passive observer be able to tell if the person meant it or not? You really can’t without knowing both parties involved, their history together, and if that person regularly does similar styles of joke.

                    It’s easier to just pick a different word to insult someone’s intelligence instead of one that’s designed to hurt a specific group of people.

              • exothermic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                6 months ago

                By comparing people to these slurs, you enforce societal norms that indicate that the said group has less value in society.

                Since humans are social creatures by nature, you are essentially dehumanizing an entire class/group of people because you can’t come up with something more clever to say.

                To err is human, we all make mistakes, intelligence/sight/etc. has nothing to do with it.

                  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Your submission in “lemmy user(ule)s: “this sign won’t stop me because i can’t read”” was removed - Using disability as an insult is not ok, end of story.

                  • Gigagoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    fuck off, you don’t get to hop on a high horse here. you don’t get to turn it around when you’re straight up refusing to reflect on your own behaviour. i’m sure you think you’re being very clever, but i can guarantee what you’re doing right now is such common bigot behaviour that the people in this thread see right through it.

                    you feel like you should be allowed to use a slur. extremely weird, but alright. the people around you will, however, react accordingly. you’re not special.

                  • criitz@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    We probably wont convince you in these comments, but using someone’s condition as an insult to someone else can definitely hurt them. It can seem like an unimportant issue when it doesn’t directly affect you. I remember as a kid, I had friends with disabled family members who got really upset when others used the r-word. When it affects you directly it becomes a lot more clear.

              • criitz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I don’t agree with OP that you should never be allowed to call someone names… But I do think the r word is potentially hurtful to actually mentally disabled people, so I wouldn’t use it for that reason.

                In general its better to use words that represent choices people make and not unchangable aspects. I wouldn’t use terms “black”, “retarded”, or “gay” as insults, for example. Someone below suggested “foolish” as a good example since it’s not an inherent trait but a behavior.

                • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  i don’t think you shouldn’t ever be allowed to call someone names, not sure where you got that lol. for the record i 100% agree with your comment :)

                  sorry if i come across any other way i just personally find it important to sass people who vehemently defend “muh rights” to use established slurs

                  • ealoe@ani.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    It’s only an “established slur” to some people (mostly in online niche communities), to a lot of people it’s just everyday speech. Words such as retarded, special needs, intellectually disabled, moron, imbecile and more are all terms used to describe a disability, just like “blind”. I’m tired of this artificially accelerated pejoration sped along by people who just want to correct others to feel good about themselves, the euphemism treadmill for people with intellectual disabilities in particular spins faster than for any other topic. We haven’t invented 15 different phrases for blind in the last 50 years, there’s no reason to do it for disabled brains any more than for disabled eyeballs.

                    Instead that energy should be focused on ensuring people don’t use someone’s disability to put the disabled person down. Those people are the real problem, not normal folks criticizing people for their shitty behaviors they can control, not immutable characteristics about themselves.

                • ealoe@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Foolish seems like a useful word, probably could be substituted and keep the intended meaning intact.

              • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                6 months ago

                Your submission in “lemmy user(ule)s: “this sign won’t stop me because i can’t read”” was removed for Using disability as an insult is not ok, end of story.

            • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’ve been called dyslexic before as a slur a few times. I laughed every time and explained that I am dyslexic.

              Zero times have I ever, EVER cared that someone used this word like this. Why? Because they are human beings that saw symptoms and thought it was funny.

              Is dyslexia funny? Yeah, sometimes. In the same way, there are some hilarious characters that are blind. Our differences don’t have to be something we’re constantly defensive about. Humor is a very human reaction to coming to terms with such things.

              Some people just need to take a step back and realize it’s okay to inject these things into humor, IF you do it tactfully, and with a measure of compassion.

              • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                i’m glad you can find humor in it but it’s also important that you shouldn’t tell others when to not feel offended

                which you are doing with the phrase “some people need to take a step back.” that’s a really unkind thing to say.

                (edited for clarity because i misspoke 🙂)

                • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  I could not agree more! I hope you re-read what you just wrote.

                  Edit: Wow… that was a really dishonest edit you just made. You literally edited your comment so it looks like I’m conceding my position, and you didn’t even put “Edit” in there. I think we’re done here… if you’re doing things like this, then nobody on this platform should be conversing with you seriously.

                  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    i edited my comment because i misspoke, which you accurately called out, and i thanked you for. please be kind.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          6 months ago

          I prefer to tell people they’re being foolish. Foolish is something we all do, and one can snap out of it.

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 months ago

      Using a slur to insult someone, regardless of if they are a member of that group, shows that you view it as an inherently negative trait, and that people should be ashamed of being a part of, or associated with, the group.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      nobody is going to arrest you for using the word, and many people will celebrate you using it. The problem is those people are mostly assholes. The word you should be thinking about is “audience”.

    • industrialdeerfluff@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Look I usually only lurk because im too anxious but I have to say something.

      Your logic is the exact logic my neo nazi family use. (not an exaggeration, I grew up around the klan)

      “If they act like an N word, why cant I call them an N word, its not like im racist, i call stupid/criminal/bad whites N words too.”

      So i think anyone who uses this logic to justify a slurs usage should take a moment for self reflection.

      (This is coming from someone who is queer and will use queer slurs only in certain company, in private, where everyone involved is aware and into it. (and even then I get uncomfy, especially when im in a new group and I don’t know people and they start throwing words around.))

      (Also to add I was one of those “slow” kids who has alot of history with the cruel things my family and others called me.

    • juliebean@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      words do area-of-effect damage, friend.

      if you use the r-slur around me, even if its not directed at me, it hurts, and it makes me feel less safe with you, because of the way that word has been used to specifically target me for hatred based on my neurotype. plus there’s the fact that you acknowledge it to be a mean word for disabled people, and if you’re using it as a weapon against non-disabled people, you’re really saying ‘haha, you’re like those disabled people, and that’s terrible.’ i hope you can see how this probably doesn’t feel so good to a lot of us?

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I agree completely with this. This campaign to make this word just as bad as the “n word” is absolutely ridiculous. I’ve brought this up with a lot of people, and I’ve yet to meet someone in real life who genuinely thinks this word should be censored in this manner.

      Edit: This needs more context… please refer to my expansive explanation here: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/12210243

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      what annoys me is that no one cared about this until Sarah Palin made a big deal out of someone calling her that and she pretended to get offended for her baby with down syndrome as if it was targeted on them.

      but I’m also ok with never saying it again. not a big loss who cares. at least we got a legendary Linus clip out of it.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          that’s not what we’re talking about. as the original commenter said, using the r word to refer to any mentally challenged person was already a no-no. that law changed official use of the word, not the r word itself used as an insult.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            law reflects society. just providing a timeline for things, the word as an insult was a problem starting well into the 90s so it’s absolutely absurd to blame it on sarah palin in 2013.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              if you think people started saying r-word in the 70s you’re out of your mind

                • pyre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  ok, but the r word was very much acceptable through the early 2000s. it was even casually used on tv.

                  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    ok, but so was the n-word with a slightly different timeline. none of this invalidates my statement that sarah palin has nothing to do with it.

    • BaskinRobbins@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      This is my take on it. Moron evolved to be a more general term associated with anyone acting foolish. It evolved to the point that nobody really associates it as a word targeted directly at intellectualy disabled folks. The r-word was always more commonly understood as “the word you would say to a disabled person if you wanted to hurt them the most”. Because of this people who use it weren’t/aren’t given the benefit of the doubt that they’re just being hyperbolic and not actually a bigot directly to disabled people. Why did one evolve to be more hurtful than the other? I’m not sure. There’s probably a parallel universe out there where the reverse scenario exists.

      Edit: nvm, disregard. just realized this post is 10d old and people already articulated what I intended much better than me.