Linux Mint as been in development for over 15 years. Its good for them to get some press coverage and positive attention.

As far as I can tell most people switching to Linux Mint are fairly happy with the experience beside some minor Linux quarks.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      KDE is is designed to be customized at the cost of user friendliness. Cinnamon has a lot customization but it isn’t as overwhelming and is much more stable. It also is GTK which is nice.

      • menemen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, great, you don’t like KDE. Good for you. What does it have to do with me liking KDE very much?

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Because the Linux Mint team (I think it was on guy at that point) decided that KDE could not be adjusted to make the desktop they wanted. KDE isn’t designed to be made into a separate system and neither is modern gnome. Gnome 2 was ideal and that is why it was forked and turned into cinnamon.

          Linux Mint aims to be simple and easy to use. I don’t believe KDE does that as well. The good news with KDE is that is is very customizable for those who like to tinker will the desktop.

          I also think Linux Mint is heavily invested in GTK. Using KDE would involve a significant shift. What’s wrong with KDE Neon?

          • menemen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yes, I understand their reasoning. I still want to use KDE and thus don’t use mint. What is your point? Please stop this.

    • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Real question: Is it not possible to install KDE, even though they do not provide an ISO with it?

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        it’s not recommended, it causes massive issues with the built in programs and you will spend ore time fighting your system then just going with a native, I just tried this a few months back

      • menemen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Possible? Yes. Am I too lazy to do this plus troubleshoot it all the time? Yes.

      • Berny23@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I did install it via package manager back when I used this distro and it worked well, but some weeks after, I switched distros to Kubuntu. Now I’m using Arch btw. with latest KDE Plasma (I recommend this).

    • Rizilia@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      True! I’m currently on Mint but want to try out KDE. So I probably will have a look at Fedora when I have the free time to do so.