tst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoStreaming TV costs now higher than cable, as 'crash' finally hits9to5mac.comexternal-linkmessage-square462fedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down147
arrow-up11.54Karrow-down1external-linkStreaming TV costs now higher than cable, as 'crash' finally hits9to5mac.comtst123@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square462fedilink
minus-squarecheesemonk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·1 year agoCan they really count internet costs which most people would need even if they weren’t streaming?
minus-squareredeyejedi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoGreat point. I guess there’s maybe someone that doesn’t need internet in there home. But the average person these days can’t function without it.
minus-square_Tom_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI was doing it to try to make their claim seem sane. Are people really on 4-5 streaming services?
minus-squarecheesemonk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThere definitely are. My partner has Netflix, Prime, Peacock, and the Disney plus bundle. I feel like it isn’t that uncommon of a scenario tbh.
Can they really count internet costs which most people would need even if they weren’t streaming?
Great point. I guess there’s maybe someone that doesn’t need internet in there home. But the average person these days can’t function without it.
I was doing it to try to make their claim seem sane. Are people really on 4-5 streaming services?
There definitely are. My partner has Netflix, Prime, Peacock, and the Disney plus bundle. I feel like it isn’t that uncommon of a scenario tbh.